Magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effects in (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 compounds
Wu X F1, 2, 3, Guo C P1, Cheng G2, 3, †, Li C R1, Wang J2, 3, Du Y S2, 3, ‡, Rao G H2, 3, Du Z M1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Information Materials, Guilin 541004, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: cpguo@ustb.edu.cn duyusong@guet.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2014CB643703), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0700901), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51261004 and 51761007), and Guangxi Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. 2018GXNSFAA294051).

Abstract
Abstract

The crystal structure, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds are investigated. All the compounds crystallize in a cubic Dy5Pd2-type structure with the space group Fd3m and undergo a second order transition from spin glass (SG) state to paramagnetic (PM) state. The spin glass transition temperatures Tg decrease from 26 K for x = 0 to 13 K for x = 0.5. In the PM region, the reciprocal susceptibilities for all the compounds obey the Curie–Weiss law. The paramagnetic Curie temperatures ( ) for Ho5Pd2, (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 are determined to be 32 K, 30 K, and 22 K, respectively, and the corresponding effective magnetic moments ( are 10.8 /Ho, 10.3 /RE, and 7.5 /RE, respectively. Magnetocaloric effect (MCE) is anticipated according to the Maxwell relation, based on the isothermal magnetization curves. For a magnetic field change of 0–5 T, the maximum values of the isothermal magnetic entropy change of the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds are determined to be , , and , with corresponding refrigerant capacity values of , , and , respectively.

1. Introduction

The magnetocaloric effect (MCE) is an intrinsic thermal response of all magnetic materials. The magnetic refrigeration based on MCE is a promising alternative technology to the conventional gas compression or expansion refrigeration because of its higher energy efficiency and it is more friendly to the environmental.[15] MCE can be characterized by the isothermal magnetic entropy change ( ) or an adiabatic temperature change ( ) when applying or removing a magnetic field. Another important parameter is the refrigerant capacity (RC), which is a measure of how much heat can be transferred between the cold and the hot sinks in one ideal refrigeration cycle, which depends on not only the but also the width of the T curve.[2,6] According to the nature of the phase transition, the MCE materials can be divided into two kinds: first-order transition (FOT) and second-order transition (SOT) materials. FOT materials usually have large values of due to the abrupt change but are accompanied with remarkable thermal and magnetic hystereses, which reduce the effective RC values of magnetic materials.[7,8] In contrast, the of the SOT materials are generally smaller than those of the FOT materials but the SOT materials show a good reversible behavior of the magnetization in response to the temperature and magnetic fields. The success of the magnetic refrigeration technology depends substantially on the discovery of new materials with large MCE at the temperature of interest. Consequently, considerable efforts have been made to explore and develop new MCE materials in view of their applications in room temperature refrigeration to reduce the emission of green house gases. Several families of MCE materials with large MCE have been found, such as Gd5Si4−xGex,[9,10] La(Fe, Si)13,[1114] MnFePxAs1−x,[15] MnAs1−xSbx,[16] and Heulser alloys Ni–Mn–X with (X=Ga, Sn, ).[1721] Meanwhile, the materials working at the low temperature regime are important because of their potential applications in special technological areas, such as space science, liquefaction of hydrogen in the fuel industry, and liquefaction of helium.[22] For this purpose, the rare earth (RE) based alloys and compounds have been systematically studied due to their magnetic transitions at low temperatures. Some have been found to possess excellent magnetocaloric properties,[2346] such as ErCo2, HoPd, TmGa, TmCuAl, HoFeSi, ErFeSi, Dy3Al2, Nd7Pd3, etc.

The binary RE–transition metal compounds of the type RE5Pd2 (RE = Tb, Dy, Ho) were first reported by Berkowitz et al.[47] Loebich and Raub[48] then revealed the existence of Y5Pd2 and Er5Pd2 compounds. Fornasini and Palenzona investigated the crystal structure of the RE5Pd2 type compounds, and determined that all of them crystallized in a cubic Dy5Pd2-type structure (space group Fd3m).[49] Preliminary magnetic measurements of the RE5Pd2 compounds were carried out by Yakinthos et al.[50] They found that these compounds showed an antiferromagnetic transition with Néel temperatures between 15.0 K (Er) and 63.5 K (Tb). However, later investigations have suggested that RE5Pd2 owned a complex magnetic state. Klimczak et al. reported that the compounds RE5Pd2 (Tb-Er) ordered magnetically and showed a spin reorientation behavior;[51] while with the aid of dc and ac magnetic susceptibilities, magnetic memory effect, and heat capacity measurements, Sharma et al. proved that the Er5Pd2 compound underwent a spin-glass magnetic phase transition below 17.2 K, accompanied by a large magnetocaloric effect.[52] Very recently, a large change in the magnetic entropy was reported for the Dy5Pd2 compound and there was a magnetic glass behavior below 38 K.[53] By means of the neutron diffraction technique, the existence of the spin-glass behaviors in Ho5Pd2 and Tb5Pd2 below the spin-glass transition temperature Tg was confirmed[54] and a considerable value of relative cooling power (RCP) in the Ho5Pd2 compound have been observed.[55]

In the present work, we chose Ho5Pd2 as the matrix phase. The crystal structure, magnetic properties, and magnetocaloric behavior of Ho5Pd2, as well as the Y-doped compounds (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 ( and 0.5) have been studied in detail. The results show that all these compounds exhibit the spin-glass state and the Tg of (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) is lowered with the increase of the yttrium content. The considerable magnetocaloric effects indicate that the series of the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 compounds may be used for magnetic refrigeration application at low temperature.

2. Experimental details

Polycrystalline samples of (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 were prepared by an arc melting method under an argon atmosphere. The high purity Pd (99.95 wt.%), Ho (99.99 wt.%), and Y (99.99 wt.%) were re-melted more than four times to ensure homogeneity on a water-cooled copper hearth. To compensate the loss of Ho and Y during melting, 0.5% excess of Ho and 1% excess of Y were added and the total weight loss of the arc-cast sample was less than 0.5%. Subsequently, the alloy was sealed in an evacuated quartz tube and annealed at 800 K for 60 days and then quenched in ice-water mixture. Each sample was cut into two parts: the first was ground into powder for x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, which was carried out on a PANalytical PIXcel 3D x-ray powder diffractometer using Cu- radiation at 45 kV and 40 mA between 20° and 90°; the second was used for magnetic measurements. The phase and crystal structure were checked by Rietveld refinement of the XRD using the FullProf software. The temperature and magnetic field dependences of magnetizations were acquired on a commercial vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) of the physical properties measurement system (PPMS-9, Quantum Design).

3. Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the observed and refined powder XRD patterns of (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) at room temperature (RT). The good match (Rwp=8.9%, Rexp=7.75%, for x = 0; Rwp=10.2%, Rexp=6.41%, for x=0.25; Rwp=9.7%, Rexp=7.64%, for x=0.5) between the observed and refined values indicates that all the compounds are single phase and crystallize in a cubic Dy5Pd2-type structure with the space group Fd3m. For comparison, the enlarged main characteristic diffraction peaks for the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds are presented in the inset. We can clearly see that the positions of the diffraction peaks shift to a smaller angle when increasing the Y content, which should be related to the relative larger radius of the yttrium atom than that of holmium. The lattice parameter a and unit-cell volume V of the compound Ho5Pd2 are confirmed to be 13.4428 Å and 2429.2 Å3, which are consistent with the previous reported data in Ref. [56]. The corresponding a and V for the (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2 and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 compounds are refined to be 13.4906 Å, 2455.2 Å3 and 13.5315 Å, 2477.7 Å3, respectively.

Fig. 1. The observed (dots) and calculated intensities (line drawn through the data points) of the fully refined powder diffraction pattern of (a) Ho5Pd2, (b) (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (c) (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2. The short vertical lines indicate the calculated Bragg peak positions of the cubic Dy5Pd2-type crystal structure. The curve at the bottom of the plot shows the difference between the observed and calculated intensities. The inset shows the enlarged main characteristic diffraction peaks for the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds.

The zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) magnetization curves were measured under a magnetic field of 0.02 T for the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds and the results are shown in Figs. 2(a)2(c) (left scale), respectively. As can be seen, the ZFC curves for these compounds all show a cusp corresponding to the peak temperatures of 26 K, 20 K, and 13 K, respectively, indicating the presence of a magnetic phase transition. Additionally, the FC curves also show small peaks at the same temperatures with the ZFC curves, however, followed by an upturn. In general, a peak in the FC curve is observed in the systems that undergo an antiferromagnetic transition, while a small peak at glass transition temperature followed by a plateau has been reported in the spin-glass system.[57] The upturns in the FC curves below the magnetic transition temperature indicate the presence of clusters of spins.[58] Moreover, the spin-glass behavior in Ho5Pd2 below the magnetic phase transition temperature was also confirmed by the neutron diffraction technique, which is regarded as the most direct technology to determine the magnetic structure. Therefore, we can conclude that all the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds undergo a spin-glass state to paramagnetic state magnetic transition at the Tg of 26 K, 20 K, and 13 K, respectively, and the temperature of spin-glass transition decreases with increasing yttrium content. Figure 2(a) (right-hand scale) shows the temperature dependence of the magnetic reciprocal susceptibility 1/χ derived from the FC curve under a magnetic field of 200 Oe for Ho5Pd2. It is observed that the reciprocal susceptibility obeys Curie–Weiss law in the PM region. Here is the paramagnetic Curie temperature and C is the Curie–Weiss constant. The effective magnetic moment derived from the Curie–Weiss constant is 10.8 /Ho atom, which is slightly higher than the theoretical value of Ho3+ (10.6 ). It suggests that the Pd atom in the cubic structure Ho5Pd2 compound is non-magnetic. The value of the paramagnetic Curie temperature is determined to be 32 K, which is in agreement with the previous reported value of 33 K.[47] The positive value of indicates the dominance of ferromagnetic interactions in the spin-glass state. The temperature dependence of the magnetic reciprocal susceptibility for (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2 and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 is displayed in Figs. 22(b) and 22(c) (right-hand scale), respectively, and the reciprocal susceptibility of both compounds shows the Curie–Weiss-type behavior in the PM region. The average values of the effective magnetic moments for (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2 and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 are determined to be 10.3 /RE and 7.5 /RE, respectively, and the corresponding values of the paramagnetic Curie temperature are obtained to be 30 K and 22 K. As the yttrium content increases, both the effective magnetic moments and paramagnetic Curie temperatures of the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 compounds show a decrease trend, however, not linearly. To investigate the thermal hysteresis near the Tg, the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) samples were first subjected to an applied field of 200 Oe and measured on cooling and then heating models. The obtained MT curves for (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) are shown in Figs. 3(a)3(c), respectively. For both Ho5Pd2 and (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, the maximum thermal hysteresis is approximately 1.7 K, whereas that for the (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 compound is determined to be less than 1 K, indicating that the substitution of Y for Ho can reduce the thermal hysteresis of (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2. The relatively small values of thermal hysteresis suggest that the phase transitions in these compounds probably belong to the SOT type, which is beneficial for the efficiency of the magnetic refrigeration.

Fig. 2. Temperature dependence of ZFC and FC magnetizations (left scale) and the reciprocal susceptibility ( , right scale) along with the Curie–Weiss fit for (a) Ho5Pd2, (b) (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (c) (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 under the magnetic field of 200 Oe.
Fig. 3. The MT curves under a magnetic field of 200 Oe on heating and cooling processes for (a) Ho5Pd2, (b) (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (c) (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2.

To evaluate the MCEs for the series of (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5), sets of isothermal magnetization curves at different temperature steps in magnetic fields up to 5 T were recorded, as displayed in Figs. 4(a), 4(c), and 4(e). After one isothermal curve was recorded, the applied field was isothermally reduced to zero, and then the temperature was increased slowly for another curve. It can be observed that there is a considerable difference among the MH for each compound in different temperature ranges. In the magnetic isotherms below Tg, the magnetizations increase rapidly with the increase of the magnetic field, showing the feature of the ferromagnetism, which suggests that the FM exchange interaction dominates in the spin-glass state of the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds. It is also observed that the magnetization does not saturate under field as high as 5 T and the similar kind of MH curves with non-saturating behavior was observed in the compounds showing glassy magnetic behavior and also in canted AFM systems.[57,59] In the PM region, there exist curvatures in the isothermal curves near Tg, probably indicating the existence of short-range FM correlations in the PM state which are also induced by the applied field, and the MH curves become more and more linear with the temperature increasing. This phenomenon comes from the competition of the applied field and temperature for the FM state. By comparing the MH curves of Ho5Pd2, (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2, it is found that the magnetizations decrease obviously with increasing yttrium content, which happens because the Y element is nonmagnetic. To examine the magnetic hysteresis in (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5), two selected magnetization isotherms for each compound on increasing and decreasing fields near Tg were measured and are shown in Figs. 4(b), 4(d), and 4(f), respectively. It is clearly seen that the isothermal curves in the magnetizing process are perfectly overlapping with those in the demagnetizing process, exhibiting no magnetic hysteresis and a perfect reversibility of the magnetic phase transitions, which is the characteristic of the SOT.

Fig. 4. The isothermal magnetization curves for (a) Ho5Pd2, (c) (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (e) (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 measured with the magnetizing process up to 5 T. The magnetization and demagnetization curves for (b) Ho5Pd2, (d) (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (f) (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2.

It is well-known that a large magnetic entropy change is expected around the magnetic transition temperature since the magnetization changes rapidly by varying the temperature and the MCE has a strong correlation with the order of the corresponding magnetic phase transition. Thus, it is important to understand the nature of magnetic transition in (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2. In general, Arrott plots are used to determine the type (FOT or SOT) of the phase transition of a compound. According to the Banerjee criterion,[60] the nature of the magnetic transition is of the second order if all the Arrott plots have a positive slope. Meanwhile, if some of the curves display a negative slope or inflection at some points, the nature of the magnetic transition is of the first order. To further understand the nature of the magnetic transition in the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds, the measured MH isotherms for the compounds at various temperatures were converted to the vs. H/M plots (Arrott plots) as presented in Figs. 5(a), 5(c), and 5(e), respectively. Neither negative slope nor inflection can be observed in the Arrott plots near Tg in each sample, which shows the occurrence of the second order magnetic phase transition from spin-glass state to PM state for the Ho5Pd2, (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 compounds.

Fig. 5. The plots of H/M versus M 2 (Arrott curve) for (a) Ho5Pd2, (c) (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (e) (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 at different temperatures. The isothermal magnetization curves measured with the magnetizing process up to 5 T. The magnetic entropy change as a function of temperature for various magnetic field changes for (b) Ho5Pd2, (d) (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (f) (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2.

The temperature dependence of for (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) under a magnetic field change of 5 T was derived from the isothermal MH curves by utilizing the Maxwell relation , where T is the absolute temperature and H is the applied magnetic field, and is shown in Figs. 5(b), 5(d), and 5(f), respectively. As expected, the maximum values of the entropy change occur near the transition temperatures and increase with the increase of the magnetic field. The peaks of for (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 shift to the lower temperature with the increase of Y content, indicating that the Y doping can decrease the working temperature range for the series of (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 compounds. Here, it should be noted that the T curve for Ho5Pd2 has another peak which is obvious under the low magnetic field change. This is probably due to that there exits another magnetic transition in the sample Ho5Pd2 below the Tg, which is likely the spin-reorientation. For the samples (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2 and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2, there are also inflections in the T curves below the temperatures of Tg, however, inconspicuously. Under the magnetic field changes of 0–5 T, the maximum values of the magnetic entropy change ( ) for Ho5Pd2, (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 are evaluated to be , , and , respectively.

As mentioned previously, the refrigerant capacity (RC) is also an important criterion of a potential magnetic refrigerant. Based on the T curves, the RC is estimated using the approach suggested by Gschneidner et al.[1] and defined as , where T1 and T2 are the temperatures corresponding to the half-maximum values at the two sides of the peak, respectively. The RC values for the Ho5Pd2, (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 compounds are determined to be , , and for a field change of 0–5 T, respectively. The considerable RC values suggest that the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 compounds could be the attractive candidate materials for the magnetic refrigerator working at low temperature. The transition temperature ( ), the values of ( ), RC as well as the lattice parameters for the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 compounds are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

The lattice parameters, the transition temperature (Tg), the maximum entropy change , as well as the refrigerant capacity under T for (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5).

.
4. Conclusion

In the present work, the crystal structure, magnetic transitions, and magnetocaloric properties of the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds were investigated experimentally by XRD and magnetic measurements. All the compounds crystallize in a cubic Dy5Pd2-type with the space group Fd3m, and the lattice parameter a and unit-cell volume V for x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5 were determined to be 13.4428 Å, 2429.2 Å3, 13.4906 Å, 2455.2 Å3; and 13.5315 Å, 2477.7 Å3, respectively. A second order spin-glass to PM transition occurs in each sample and the transition temperatures (Tg) were determined to be 26 K, 20 K, and 13 K for x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5, respectively. In the PM region, the reciprocal susceptibilities for all the compounds obey the Curie–Weiss law. The paramagnetic Curie temperature ( ) for Ho5Pd2, (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 were determined to be 32 K, 30 K, and 22 K, and the corresponding effective magnetic moments ( ) were determined to be 10.8 /Ho, 10.3 /RE, and 7.5 /RE, respectively. Using the Maxwell relation, the magnetic entropy changes of the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 (x = 0, 0.25, and 0.5) compounds were calculated. For a field change of 5 T, the maximum magnetic entropy changes of the Ho5Pd2, (Ho0.75Y0.25)5Pd2, and (Ho0.5Y0.5)5Pd2 compounds are , , and , respectively, with the corresponding RC values of , , and . The considerable MCE values and adjustable working temperature range indicate that the (Ho1−xYx)5Pd2 compounds could be promising candidates for magnetic refrigeration at low temperatures.

Reference
[1] Gschneidner K A Jr. Pecharsky V K Tsokol A O 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 1479
[2] Shen B G Sun J R Hu F X Zhang H W Cheng Z H 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 4545
[3] Brück E 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 R381
[4] de Oliveira N A Von Ranke P J 2010 Phys. Rep. 489 89
[5] Pecharsky V K Gschneidner K A Jr. 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200 44
[6] Pecharsky V K Gschneidner K A Jr. 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 90 4614
[7] Provenzano V Shapiro A J Shull R D 2004 Nature 429 853
[8] Shen J Gao B Zhang H W Hu F X Li Y X Sun J R Shen B G 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 142504
[9] Pecharsky V K Gschneidner K A Jr. 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 4494
[10] Gschneidner K A Jr. 2009 Acta. Mater 57 18
[11] Hu F X Shen B G Sun J R Cheng Z H Rao G H Zhang X X 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 3675
[12] Hu F X Shen B G Sun J R Zhang X X 2000 Chin. Phys. 9 0550
[13] Zhang X X Wen G H Wang F W Wang W H Yu C H Wu G H 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 3072
[14] Zhang X X Wang F W Wen G H 2001 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 L747
[15] Tegus O Brück E Buschow K H J De Boer F R 2002 Nature 415 150
[16] Wada H Tanabe Y 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 3302
[17] Hu F X Shen B G Sun J R Wu G H 2001 Phys. Rev. 64 132412
[18] Krenke T Duman E Acet M Wassermann E F Moya X M anosa L Planes A 2005 Nat. Mater. 4 450
[19] Kainuma R Imano Y Ito W Sutou Y Morito H Okamoto S Kitakami O Oikawa K Fujita A Kanomata T Ishida K 2006 Nature 439 957
[20] Planes A M anosa L Acet M 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 233201
[21] Liu J Gottschall T Skokov K P Moore J D Gutfleisch O 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 620
[22] Tishin A M Spichkin Y I 2003 The Magnetocaloric Effect and its Applications Coey J M D Tilley D R Vij D R Bristol Institute of Physics Publishing 10.1016/S1369-7021(03)01134-9
[23] Wada H Tanabe Y Shiga M Sugawara H Sato H 2001 J. Alloys Compd. 316 245
[24] Li L W Yi Y L Su K P Qi Y Huo D X Pöttgen R 2016 J. Mater. Sci. 51 5421
[25] Huo J J Du Y S Cheng G Wu X F Ma L Wang J Xia Z C Rao G H 2018 J. Rare Earth 36 1044
[26] Chen J Shen B G Dong Q Y Sun J R 2010 Solid State Commun. 150 157
[27] Wang L C Shen B G 2014 Rare Met. 33 239
[28] Chen J Shen B G Dong Q Y Sun J R 2010 Solid State Commun. 150 1429
[29] Singh N K Kumar P Mao Z Paudyal D Neu V Suresh K G Pecharsky V K Gschneidner K A 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 456004
[30] Mo Z J Shen J Gao X Q Liu Y Wu J F Shen B G Sun J R 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 037503
[31] Zheng X Q Shen J Hu F X Sun J R Shen B G 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 217502 in Chinese
[32] Mo Z J Sun Q L Wang C H Wu H Z Li L Meng F B Tang C C Zhao Y Shen J 2017 Ceram. Int. 43 2083
[33] Wang Y X Zhang H Wu M L Tao K Li Y W Yan T Long K W Long T Pang Z Long Y 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 127104
[34] Zhang H Shen B G Xu Z Y Shen J Hu F X Sun J R Long Y 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 092401
[35] Zhang H Sun Y J Yang L H Niu E Wang H S Hu F X Sun J R Shen B G 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 063901
[36] Wu M L Zhang H Xu Z Y Wang Y X Tao K Zhang Y L Yan T Long K W Li Y W Shen J Y Long Y 2017 Intermetallics 83 38
[37] Wang Y X Zhang H Long K W Xing C F Xiao Y N Su L Q Wang L C Long Y 2018 Intermetallics 100 175
[38] Mo Z J Hao Z H Shen J Li L Wu J F Hu F X Sun J R Shen B G 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 649 674
[39] Li L W Xu C Yuan Y Zhou S Q 2018 Mater. Res. Lett. 6 413
[40] Wu M L Zhang H Long K W Tao K Wang Y X Xing C F Xiao Y N Wang L C Long Y 2017 Mater Lett. 205 40
[41] Zheng X Q Shen B G 2017 Chin. Phys. 26 027501
[42] Li Y W Zhang H Yan T Long K W Wang H S Xue Y J Cheng C Zhou H B 2015 J. Alloys. Compd. 651 278
[43] Mo Z J Shen J Gao X Q Liu Y Tang C C Wu J F Hu F X Sun J R Shen B G 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 626 145
[44] Li L W Hu G H Qi Y Umehara I 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 42908
[45] Mo Z J Shen J Yan L Q Wu J F Wang L C Lin J Tang C C Shen B G 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 192407
[46] Mo Z J Shen J Yan L Q Tang C C Lin J Wu J F Sun J R Wang L C Zheng X Q Shen B G 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 052409
[47] Berkowitz A E Holtzberg F Methfessel S 1964 J. Appl. Phys. 35 1030
[48] Loebich O Raub J R E 1973 J. Less Common Met. 30 47
[49] Fornasini M L Palenzona A 1974 J. Less Common Met. 38 77
[50] Yakinthos J K Anagnostopoulos T Ikonomou P F 1977 J. Less Common Met. 51 113
[51] Klimczak M Talik E Winiarski A Troć R 2006 J. Alloys Compd. 423 62
[52] Sharma M K Yadav K Mukherjee K 2018 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30 215803
[53] Paramanik T Samanta T Ranganathna R Das I 2015 RSC Adv. 5 47860
[54] Gubkin A F A Sherstobitova E Terentyev P B Hoser A Baranov N V 2013 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25 236003
[55] Samanta T Das I Banerjee S 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 082511
[56] Toyoizumi S Kitazawa H Kawamura Y Mamiya H Terada N Tamura R Dönni A Morita K Tamaki A 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 17D101
[57] Mydosh J A 1993 Spin Glasses: an Experimental Introduction London Taylor and Francis 10.1201/9781482295191
[58] Sh P M Meyer A L Streicher M Wilson A Rash T Roth M W Kidd T E Strauss L H 2012 Phys. Rev. 85 144432
[59] McDannald A Kuna L Jain M 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 113904
[60] Banerjee B K 1964 Phys. Lett. 12 16